The way organisations view and treat their data has undergone a massive change over the past twenty years. Traditionally, organisations saw data as a by-product of their activities, possessing little value apart from the record of completed transactions.
These days, the amount and diversity of data is much greater – coming from the web, mobile apps, social networks, enterprise systems, operational technology, sensors and IoT networks – and many organisations believe that, if analysed correctly, this data can provide a window on their market and operating environment.
Data science departments have sprung up everywhere in an attempt to harness the power of data. Using analytics, machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI), organisations seek to guide decision making across all aspects of their operations and market interactions, while enabling new capabilities such as automation.
The trouble with data ‘FOMO’
Rapid technological transformation puts organisations in a tight spot, despite generating excitement and some real advances. In an evolving environment it is not always clear where limited resources should be invested. And in the absence of certainty, decision making can be motivated simply by fear of missing out (FOMO). Much of the uncertainty around data is justified.
"The amount of data we now collect is unprecedented and dealing with the data explosion is both an opportunity and a problem at every level of society."
But for organisations, the perceived opportunity combined with the fear of missing out has resulted in big investment in data and analytics infrastructure, without a clear strategy or understanding of how to derive value from those investments.
Last year ANZ organisations invested $1.3 billion[1] in data analytics tools or software. But 60 per cent of those same organisations reported having only a 'beginner' or 'basic' level of data maturity. A 2021 Global Data report, which surveyed over 1000 companies worldwide, found that despite significant investment, many organisations are failing to capitalise on their data due to infrastructure and management practices[2].
In fact, 89 per cent of Australian organisations participating in the survey reported that they are struggling to manage their data. The survey reveals that organisations are awash with data they can’t find, don't trust, fail to understand and, ultimately, proves useless for decision making or enabling new capabilities.
Similarly, a 2020 survey of over 200 IT leaders across Australia revealed high levels of concern around data strategy and data management[3]. For example, 90 per cent of IT leaders are concerned about how they will deal with rapidly increasing quantities of data. These statistics below show the reported concerns of Australian organisations.
We’re painting a worrying picture, but these statistics can be improved through a data strategy.
Data strategy 101
Slowly, organisations are recognising the need to design strategies for dealing with their data. Many have invested in all the infrastructure and software needed to collect large amounts of data, but they lack an overarching strategy. And by strategy we mean documented procedures and management practices to ensure that this data is discoverable, of high quality, and available to the data practitioners within the organisation.
A data strategy can be the mechanism that is needed to pull together investments in database management systems, data lakes, analytics applications, reporting systems and visualisation tools. Indeed, a data strategy should be independent of the underlying technology, whereby implementation is really about aligning the organisation on goals for their data practice and changing the way that people are working with data.
Highlighting dark data
Dark data is data that is collected and stored, but never used. Although some dark data is held for regulatory or compliance purposes, the amount that is held in an organisation gives us some idea of the effectiveness of its data strategy. Estimates of dark data as a proportion of the total data collected for an average organisation range from over 50 per cent to a whopping 90 per cent.
In a world that is collecting 7.5 septillion gigabytes of data every day, that is a lot of data. An even smaller proportion of data that an organisation generates or uses is actually analysed. In 2017 IBM estimated that most companies only analyse 1 per cent of their data[4].
Dark data represents a failed data strategy. That’s assuming someone thought it was a good idea to collect and store the data in the first place. The processes that enable data to be used as intended should be one of the outcomes of a well thought out data policy. The same applies to ceasing collection and disposing of data that is discovered to be not needed after all.