• John Mason - Capital infrastructure and maintenance works at airports are particularly challenging because they have to be under taken within a safety and operationally critical environment, which is usually heavily regulated and constrained. This campus development environment has particular attributes and drivers which influence how they are developed.
The development works are also normally in the public eye and the consequences of non-performance can have huge impacts on the multitude of stakeholders who use the airport.
• James Bennett - The proximity of airport related projects to each other and the high level of interface created as a result, means that the access and space required to undertake construction are usually at a premium.
This combined with the critical safety and security issues, as well as the multitude of trades that need to be utilised, means that a high degree of planning is required to ensure that delivery is carefully thought through before it commences. Programme management plays a critical role in managing these numerous interfaces.
• John - Programme management looks at all of the projects within the programme and assesses the way they have to be delivered. A critical consideration is the way projects need to work together, or interface, in order to meet the overarching outcomes being sought by the owner and the stakeholders who may be impacted by the programme.
This could mean adopting a common logistics strategy, it could mean having common project controls, reporting or BIM platform across all projects, or it could mean having an overarching delivery culture when it comes to supply chain engagement, risk allocation or safety management.
A programme level perspective means the owner is able to make strategic decisions on best for programme outcomes rather than best for project objectives. For example, this could mean delaying one project because other projects are more critical to the achievement of the overall programme.
Programme wide activities can also achieve economies of scale and project efficiencies through for example, a consolidated logistics strategy.
• John - Clarity round the outcomes being sought is of course vital. A well-designed organisational structure for delivery is also crucial, including defining the roles the owner wants to retain and those where a supply chain partner would add value.
The owner’s approach to matters such as delivery culture, safety and risk are also important, as are the more obvious drivers such as budget, cash flow and schedule milestones. Safety should always be a major priority and the structures and behaviours introduced as a consequence often have secondary benefits in other areas such as interface management and construction planning.
In this regard owners are increasingly recognising the benefits that construction management, operational and asset management thinking plays in the development of a programme’s delivery strategy and baseline schedule, with a whole of life perspective often driving programme requirements and timings.
• James - Every programme is unique but some of the issues we considered when I was working on Terminal T5 at Heathrow, London are likely to be pertinent to any major airport development programme. These included BAA’s industry changing delivery strategy, which was underpinned by the T5 Agreement and set out their overarching approach to matters such as risk, organisation, performance expectations and cultural behaviour.
A programme wide procurement strategy, combined with a robust supply chain engagement and contracting strategy was also critically important, as was the owner’s approach to communication and commercial management, which were structured around transparency and trust to incentivise positive behaviours that would facilitate rather than impede the achievement of programme outcomes.
An important tool in the successful delivery of an airport programme is the “one-model environment”. On T5, this allowed all designers to work together in a collaborative manner striving to achieve common objectives.
A programme wide approach also has considerable benefits in streamlining the effects the projects have on aviation operations, border control agencies, landside traffic management and so on. Importantly, it also has the potential to make the interfaces between the project teams and the airport’s operational staff much more efficient.