Written by Arne Nilsen, Project Director at Aurecon
There is a saying here in Queensland, Australia: it’s beautiful one day, perfect the next.
But for some Brisbane residents, beauty turned to horror when the mighty Brisbane River broke its banks on 12 January 2011, inundating thousands of homes and livelihoods.
The flooded river peaked at 4.46 metres in Brisbane City at 3:00am on Thursday 13 January 2011, devastating critical transport infrastructure.
Our Queensland Premier declared a disaster, setting up evacuation centres and a major incident room to coordinate a rescue operation.
With transport routes cut off, displaced residents waited anxiously, unable to go and inspect the damage to their homes.
Protection against the paralysing effect of future floods was a primary focus of Brisbane City Council’s AUD 100 million upgrade programme for the Brisbane ferry terminal network.
The Commonwealth and Queensland Governments approved Natural Disaster Relief and Recovery Arrangements (NDRRA) funding for the ferry terminals replacement project as part of the city rebuild.
As the main waterway through Brisbane, the river is an integral part of life in the city. After all, it’s why Brisbane is also affectionately known as the ‘River City’. With this in mind, we set out to deliver to the community a new generation of ferry terminals that took public transport infrastructure to a new level.
We challenged each other throughout the process, not only to solve the technical aspects of Brisbane City Council’s brief, but to push the limits of the possibilities across every single component.
Brisbane’s new ferry terminals include multiple technologies to help them better withstand floods.
These new generation terminals are a fine example of how architects and engineers are working together symbiotically to evolve building typologies beyond the mundane and into new territory.
We hope these terminals will become synonymous with Brisbane’s forward looking attitude to the design of public transport infrastructure and enhance commuters’ experience of and connection to the city’s key natural feature — its river.
While my nine year old son thinks the project could have used more orange paint, both he and my 11 year old daughter agree that the ferry terminals look much “cooler”. They are incredibly proud of the work their dad has done in delivering award-winning, critical infrastructure that might even outlast them.
Always conscious of our responsibility to design for future generations, I asked my children Emily, 11, and Paul, 9, what they thought of the new ferry terminals.
Paul: They will not break in a flood.
Emily: They have really attractive colours and can survive floods.
Paul: Their design is not able to break in floods and looks awesome.
Emily: The gangway is safe and can protect itself from floods.
Paul: They are much more durable and look better.
Emily: These ferry terminals look a lot more cool.
Paul: I would put more orange paint, because I think more of the ferry terminal should be orange rather than grey.
Emily: I’d put three ferry landing places because it would be more efficient in getting people to places quicker.
Paul: Not forever, but for a very long time.
Emily: I think the ferry terminals will be there for at least another 80 years.